Kick1

The Theatre of Missed Calls: United's Penalty Plea Falls Flat

Article hero image
📅 March 21, 2026⏱️ 4 min read
Published 2026-03-21 · Nicol: Man United should have been awarded 2nd penalty vs. Bournemouth

Look, I watched the Bournemouth-United game from the jump. And when that ball clattered into Adam Smith's arm in the box late in the second half, I immediately thought: "That's a spot-kick." The replay, frankly, only solidified it for me. Steve Nicol at ESPN was right to pound the table on this. United, trailing 2-1 after Dominic Solanke and Justin Kluivert had canceled out Bruno Fernandes’s opener, absolutely deserved a second crack from 12 yards.

Shaka Hislop can talk all he wants about natural arm position, but that's a cop-out. Smith, who'd already conceded a penalty for a similar offense earlier in the season against Chelsea, clearly moved his arm out. It wasn't glued to his side. It wasn't a natural follow-through from a block. It was an extension, plain and simple, preventing a potential pass or shot. The score was 2-1 to Bournemouth in the 78th minute. That’s a game-changing moment, a chance for Fernandes, who already buried one earlier, to level it up and snatch a point on the road. The VAR check lasted barely seconds, a blink-and-you-miss-it review that felt more like a shrug than a proper examination.

Here’s the thing: consistency from officials is a myth these days. We saw a near-identical handball given against West Ham’s Nayef Aguerd just weeks ago. Why is one a penalty and the other isn't? The rules, as written, are supposed to eliminate this kind of subjective interpretation, but it feels like we’re back to the wild west. United, let's be honest, aren't exactly flying high. They're sitting seventh in the Premier League table with 50 points, miles off the pace set by Arsenal and Liverpool. Every point matters, especially when you're trying to claw your way back into European contention after a season that’s seen them lose 12 league matches already. To deny them such a clear opportunity to draw level against a mid-table side like Bournemouth (who are 13th with 42 points) just adds insult to injury.

And let's not pretend United haven't been on the wrong end of some questionable calls this season. Remember the disallowed goal against Fulham back in February? Or the soft penalty given against them at Old Trafford against Tottenham in January? It seems like every week there's a new VAR controversy, and it's almost always the bigger clubs who feel the pinch more acutely because the stakes are higher. For a team trying to rebuild, trying to find some semblance of rhythm under Erik ten Hag, these moments sting. They compound the pressure. The Cherries, to their credit, played well, with Kluivert’s 36th-minute strike being a particular highlight, but the game could have, and probably should have, ended 2-2.

My take? The Premier League needs to seriously re-evaluate its VAR implementation and referee training. The current system isn’t about correcting clear and obvious errors; it’s about creating more confusion. It’s making fans, pundits, and even players question the very integrity of the game.

I predict that by next season, we’ll see a significant tweak to the handball rule, making it far less ambiguous and reducing these infuriatingly inconsistent decisions.