Remember when Liverpool was just… good? Not great, not world-beaters, but a solid side that could hang around the top four? It wasn't that long ago, really. And it's wild to think how close that era came to stretching on, all because Jürgen Klopp, the architect of this modern dynasty, almost missed the boat on Mohamed Salah. Gab Marcotti, who's been around enough big deals to know the whispers, dropped a gem this week about Klopp’s initial reluctance. Turns out, the boss had his eyes on a different target, a player he thought fit his system better than the wiry Egyptian winger tearing it up in Rome.
Thing is, the analytics department at Liverpool, led by Michael Edwards and his team, wasn't just doing busy work. They had the numbers on Salah, and those numbers screamed "world-class." This wasn't some gut feeling; this was cold, hard data showing a player who was consistently outperforming his peers in Serie A. In the 2016-17 season for Roma, Salah bagged 19 goals and 15 assists across all competitions. That's 34 goal contributions in 41 games. Think about that for a second. That's a goal or an assist every 100 minutes. For a winger. Klopp, for all his genius, was apparently looking for a more traditional wide player, someone who tracked back relentlessly and fit a specific defensive profile. But the data didn't care about profiles; it cared about output. And Salah's output was off the charts.
Liverpool eventually shelled out around £34 million for Salah in June 2017. Many, including myself, thought it was a decent fee for a good player, but certainly not a bargain. How wrong we were. Salah’s debut season at Anfield was nothing short of historic, smashing the Premier League goal record with 32 goals in 36 league appearances, adding another 11 in the Champions League. He finished the 2017-18 season with 44 goals across all competitions. That's not just "good business"; that's a franchise-altering move.
Here's the thing: without Salah, does Liverpool lift the Champions League trophy in 2019? Do they end their 30-year league title drought in 2020, accumulating 99 points in the process? Probably not. That front three of Salah, Firmino, and Mané became the most feared attack in Europe, and Salah was the spearhead. His pace, his finishing, his uncanny ability to weave through defenders – it unlocked everything. Marcotti’s story isn't just a fun anecdote; it’s a stark reminder that even the best managers can have blind spots. And it highlights the growing importance of sports science and data analytics in modern football. This wasn't just about finding a player; it was about convincing a manager to trust the numbers over his initial instinct. It was a clash of old-school scouting and new-age metrics, and the metrics won.
And I'll say this: as incredible as Salah has been, I genuinely believe his best season is still ahead of him. He’s aging like a fine wine, adapting his game, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him hit 25+ league goals again in the next two years, even as Liverpool transitions into a new era post-Klopp.
So, while Klopp gets all the glory, and rightly so, for building that incredible team, let's not forget the unsung heroes in the backroom. The guys who crunched the numbers, built the models, and presented a compelling case for Salah. They saw something in his underlying statistics – perhaps his shot volume, his expected goals, his progressive carries – that made them believe he was a superstar waiting to explode. It's a testament to a well-run organization, where different departments can challenge and inform each other, even the manager. That kind of internal debate, backed by hard evidence, is what separates the perennial contenders from the also-rans. And it almost didn't happen. Imagine a world where Liverpool signed that *other* player. The trophies might still be gathering dust.